17 January 2010

Presidential Regnal Numbers

One aspect (well, there are others) in which American leaders have been sorely lacking is that of regnal numbers. (Yes, perhaps they are more associated with royalty, but as the government continues to centralize and accrue ever more power in the executive branch, we'll soon be wondering, why not?) So, here's a list:
  1. George I
  2. John I
  3. Thomas
  4. James I
  5. James II
  6. John II
  7. Andrew I
  8. Martin
  9. William I
  10. John III
  11. James III
  12. Zachary
  13. Millard
  14. Franklin I
  15. James IV
  16. Abraham
  17. Andrew II
  18. Ulysses
  19. Rutherford
  20. James V
  21. Chester
  22. Grover
  23. Benjamin
  24. Grover [restored]
  25. William II
  26. Theodore
  27. William III
  28. Woodrow
  29. Warren
  30. Calvin
  31. Herbert
  32. Franklin II
  33. Harry
  34. Dwight
  35. John IV
  36. Lyndon
  37. Richard
  38. Gerald
  39. James VI
  40. Ronald
  41. George II
  42. William IV
  43. George III
  44. Barack
Statistics:
  • There have been six Jameses, four Johns, four Williams, three Georges, two Andrews, and two Franklins. All the other presidents—twenty-two of them—are uniquely named.
  • The greatest gap between two presidents with the same name is 192 years, between George I (Washington) and George II (Bush). The only president to follow another with the same name was James II (Monroe), coming directly after James I (Madison).
  • Only two presidents have been the son of a president, and both had their father's name: John II (Adams) and George III. One president, Benjamin, was the grandson of another, William I. Most presidents are more distantly related to other presidents, though.
  • Fourteen presidential names are those of saints; five are those of British monarchs. Seven were originally surnames; two were place names. At least three (Millard, Grover, and Woodrow) sound frankly bizarre today.
  • Fourteen are ultimately of Germanic origin; five are Hebrew; three are Greek, three Latin, one Aramaic, one French, and one Arabic (guess which?).

No comments:

Post a Comment